----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
At 04:55 PM 4/22/04 -0500, roger anderson wrote:
>Because the 1232 lbs. was a number picked without regard to this
>flight characteristic issue ( I understand that it was a metric number
>originally converted to lbs., therefore the uneven value), and it did
leave
>some obvious choices out that logically should be included with those
that
>are, EAA and others have pushed hard for the slight weight increase.
One of the objectives of SP/LSA, Roger, is to square it with the European
regs. Hince the 1232. Europe does not give a rip about the `coupe,
Chief,
et al.
Percy
==========================================================================
====
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
