----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----


I presume you A&Ps out there subscribe to Continental's Service Bulletins.
 
Have you read the latest SID97-2B which was just mailed a few days ago?
 
If so what is you take on Paragraph 1 on page 18 concerning the changes to the differential compression check?
 
I think they have screwed up. They state that if the leakage rate is BELOW the standard to reject the cylinder.
 
It seemes to me that they have confused leakage with retained pressure. If the leakage rate is very low, then the cylinder is pretty good in my book.
 
On the other hand, maybe I need to review my 6th grade grammar and re-read the paragraph. :-)
 
Cheers:
 
Paul
NC2273H
==============================================================================
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/



Reply via email to