----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----


 

Greg,

 

You’re right that “It points up the tyranny of paperwork over common sense.

 

But I think they do have some common sense behind them.  There are thousands of experimentals out there that would make fine sport planes but were certified with higher gross weight.  If the FAA didn’t ban downsizing, lots of those planes would be in for a paperwork refit to qualify, then would be flown outside the new weight limits.

 

This is the FAA’s protection against that deluge.

 

I’d keep in mind that it’s still a paperwork dunce cap for the FAA when it comes to Coupes.  I wouldn’t think a single guilty thought about slipping past that rule in a Coupe if I were sure I could get away with it.  If the change were never registered with the FAA for a new airworthiness certificate you’ve got a chance.

 

If a form 337 was submitted saying the plane was changed to be a 415-D, a new form 337 could possibly be filed saying that, while the previous form was submitted, the change was never completed and it has been confirmed by inspection that the aircraft is fully a 415-C in all ways.

 

If no form 337 was submitted to the FAA, only log pages need to be removed from a logbook.

 

No harm, no foul.

 

Ed Burkhead

http://edburkhead.com/

ed -at- edburkheadQQQ.com   (change -at- and remove the QQQ)

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Bullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 2:51 PM
To: Wood, Percy; 'roger anderson'; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [COUPERS-TECH] LSA aircraftweight qualification

 

To me this points to the inherent stupidity of government
agencies. There is no practical difference between a 415D
loaded to 1240 pounds and a 415C loaded to the same
weight, other than a sheet of paper.

It points up the tyranny of paperwork over common sense.

But what's particularly stupid is when they rather arbitrarily
codify things that just don't make any sense.

Think of the person who restores to original the wreck of a 415C
that was at some point converted to a C. Nope, cant fly it
as SP. Or someone who finds an Aeronca 7AC skeleton that
someone Rube Golberged to 7EC spec, but throws out
the extended engine mount and/or patches up the holes
in the firewall, and puts it back to being an original 7AC.
Same problem.

Greg

 

 





==============================================================================
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm
Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/



Reply via email to