----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
[The trouble with shooting from the hip is that unless you are really
really good, you get really really dead, really really quick - Dick
Chevalier]
I was about 70% with you until this
statement:
>>Building fuel pumps and other aircraft parts in today's legal
environment is a risky business. >>Just ask the people who built the
fuel selector valve in John Denver's Long-Eze. No, wait, that
>>company doesn't exist any more.
The NTSB did not find the fuel selector make and model was a factor in the
accident. What was a factor was the non-plans location of the tank
selector handle. The valve was remotely operated using a
torque tube and was 45 inches from the selector handle. The
selector handle was located behind the pilots left shoulder, extremely difficult
to reach.
This was a case where the original builder departed from the published
plans and changed the design for what he considered to be a good reason, keeping
fuel out of the cockpit area (my Citribria uses a similar scheme for the same
apparent reason). This and the location of the fuel quantity site guages
proved to be the root causes of the accident. The manufacturer of the
selector valve was not mentioned, nor was it a factor.
It is likely that your assertion that the manufacturer is no longer in
business is total BS.
Your argument was really going well but you picked an example to illustrate
your point from the homebuilt segment where certified parts are not required and
you used specious facts to lend credibility. The result is a
total lack of credibility.
Respectfully,
Dick (in the desert
of NM where it was warm and CAVU today. I went flying, did you?)
Source:
specious adj.
1. apparently true but actually false:
appearing to be true but really false
2. deceptively attractive: superficially attractive but actually of no real interest or value
2. deceptively attractive: superficially attractive but actually of no real interest or value
----- Original Message -----From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 5:04 PMSubject: Parts vs Parts Was:Re: FW: WRB Re: [COUPERS-TECH] POH.
============================================================================== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers-tech/
