----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any 
advice in this forum.]----


Friends. I made a scan through the accidet database of the NTSB server and filtered all wing and wing spar seperation accidents. It is more than I remembered. In most cases the spars were found not corroded and mainly overstressed due to aerobatics and other maneuveres. I added the docket numbers that anyone can read for himself here http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp


From the NTSB report of the Kingman crash. (factual) N94818 NTSB
Identification: LAX99FA128
"The leading edges of both wings were found accordioned in an aft direction, with associated

compressive buckling noted to the internal rib structure. The main wing spar-to-fuselage

attachments were found intact.

The attachment fitting for the inboard portion of the left wing's aft spar was observed broken from

adjacent airframe structure (see the sheriff's photograph). The fitting appeared corroded, and the

heads of several rivets in the fitting were missing. The corresponding portion of the right wing's

aft spar was found attached to the airframe."

Hartmut: This plane was loaded to the max with 2 people and experienced enormous turbulences.Corrosion in the fittings to the rear spar of wings are not new to us. The AD for the wing inspection was in power. These fittings though are being undetected by most mecahnics, because all are focussing on the structure around the main spars.



N3002H: NTSB Identification: SEA86FA231 .
The docket is stored on NTSB microfiche number 32614.

THE PLT WAS PRACTICING FLY-BYS FOR THE NEXT DAYS AIRSHOW. THE LEFT WING SUSTAINED AN INFLIGHT STRUCTURAL FAILURE. INVESTIGATION REVEALED A PROGRESSIVE CRACK IN THE #7 RIB EMANATING FROM PREVIOUS DAMAGE TO THE LEADING EDGE OF THE LEFT WING TIP. THIS RESULTED THE INFLIGHT STRUCTURAL OVERLOAD OF THE MAIN SPAR.



415-C, registration: N93848  NTSB Identification: SEA85FA217 .
The docket is stored on NTSB microfiche number 28992.

THE PVT PLT WAS OBSERVED EXECUTING A WINGS LEVEL PULL-UP FROM A DIVE DURING WHICH, THE WITNESS REPORTED, THE WING TIPS BEGAN FLUTTERING. IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER, BOTH WINGS SEPARATED IN POSITIVE OVERLOAD. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS EXISTED IN THE AREA OF THE ACCIDENT AND WINDS WERE LIGHT WITH NO REPORTED TUBULENCE. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY PRE-EXISTING WEAKNESS IN THE SPAR STRUCTURE AT THE SEPARATION POINT. THE CONDITION NECESSITATING THE PLT'S PULL-UP MANEUVER COULD NOT BE DETERMINED.



NTSB Identification: BFO93FA188 .  415-CD, registration: N4576B

THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT THE CENTER SECTION BEAM ASSEMBLY (ATTACHED TO THE WINGS FRONT SPARS) FAILED IN POSITIVE OVERLOAD. ALL FRACTURE SURFACES EXHIBITED FEATURES TYPICAL OF OVERSTRESS.

Examination of the airframe and engine did not reveal any anomalies.



NTSB Identification: MIA93FA065 . FORNEY ERCOUPE F-1, registration: N7555C

ONE OF THE TWO OCCUPANTS APPLIED FULL UP ELEVATOR CONTROL AT AN AIRSPEED ABOVE MANEUVERING SPEED (VA) WHICH CAUSED BOTH FORWARD WING SPARS TO FAIL IN THE POSITIVE DIRECTION. THE AIRPLANE DESCENDED NEAR VERTICAL AND IMPACTED THE GROUND IN A NOSE-LOW ATTITUDE. EXAM OF THE AIRPLANE AT THE ACCIDENT SITE REVEALED NO EVIDENCE OF FLIGHT CONTROL PREIMPACT FAILURE OR MALFUNCTION. METALLURGICAL EXAMINATION OF THE FRACTURE SURFACES OF THE WING SPARS REVEALED NO EVIDENCE OF PREEXISTING CRACKS OR CORROSION.



NTSB Identification: CHI91FA305 . ERCOUPE 415-D, registration: N99283

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:

THE PILOT'S EXCEEDING THE DESIGN LIMITS OF THE AIRCRAFT, WHICH RESULTED IN AN INFLIGHT BREAKUP.



NTSB Identification: SEA85FA217

THE PVT PLT WAS OBSERVED EXECUTING A WINGS LEVEL PULL-UP FROM A DIVE DURING WHICH, THE WITNESS REPORTED, THE WING TIPS BEGAN FLUTTERING. IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER, BOTH WINGS SEPARATED IN POSITIVE OVERLOAD.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF ANY PRE-EXISTING WEAKNESS IN THE SPAR STRUCTURE AT THE SEPARATION POINT.





Hartmut





----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Burkhead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ctech" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:07 PM
Subject: RE: [COUPERS-TECH] Coupes losing wings.


----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----




Fred Fowler wrote:

The first was about ten years ago. They had a Coupe fly

in at Lake Havasu AZ and around 20 Coupes attended. I

was there and spoke to  most of the pilots including a guy

from Calif who flew in with his father. That was on a Sat

and the next morning the father and son flew up to

Kingman for breakfast despite winds 20 to 30mph

prevailing. While  on final approach at Kingman they hit a

downdraft and when they bottomed out one wing in the

wing stub cracked back a few inches and the plane rolled

over and straight into the ground, both were killed.

Inspection of the bottom section indicated high corrosion

through out the stub section, and shortly after the FAA

mandated the second AD on the wing section, the first

being the main wing panels, the new one being new

panels in the bottom of the stub or wing removal every

three years for inspection.



Fred,



I had not known that the Kingman crash was due to corrosion. The second one
I referred to was another event in which the owner was flying solo and was
thought to do aerobatics in his plane.



So, that brings my count to three lost due to structural failure of the
wings in the last 26 years.  One that seems to be purely due to corrosion
and two due, I think, to aerobatics.



There was one other structural failure incident in, I think, Ohio. In that one, the empennage separated from the aircraft. In discussing that with the investigator, he told me he thought it was due to elevator flutter resulting
from the dual failure of the trim tab cable connection and a weak trim tab
spring (the spring is supposed to hold the tab against the limiter in case
of cable or connector failure).



Ed Burkhead

http://edburkhead.com

ed -at- edburkhead???.com          (change -at- to @ and remove "???")






==============================================================================
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm



==============================================================================
To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm



Reply via email to