Hartmut, Thank you for the info. The Type Certificate lists variations of Sensenich props, and I wasn't sure how this one would compare to the McCauley 7150. Since they are both "cruise props" I can now assume that they will both give the same climb and cruise performance on a given airplane.
Fred ---- Hartmut Beil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ============= Fred Sensenich lists the 46 prop as a standard prop on a C85 Ercoupe 415C, 415CD, 415D, E, G Continental C-85 76AK-2-46(standard) 76AK-2-48(cruise) 24.00 lbs. (http://www2.sensenich.com/direct/miscprop.htm) The McCauley 7150 is considered the standard prop as well on that engine. So, yes both compare from a technical point. Hartmut To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 18:44:55 -0400Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Prop comparison Can anyone tell me how a Sensenich model 76ak-2-46 prop would compare to a McCauley 7150 prop? Does the 46 in the Sensich have the same meaning as the 50 in the McCauley prop?Thanks,Fred _________________________________________________________________ Your PC, mobile phone, and online services work together like never before. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108587394/direct/01/
