I don't see it on that list.

Kevin1

--- In [email protected], Caliendo Dan <djcalie...@...> 
wrote:
>
> I'm not ready to buy; but was curious what it cost and thought 
others  
> would be
> also, so I looked.
>       http://store.wagaero.com/advanced_search_result.php? 
> sessId=B33BCBCED570E29DC807378F24C4D2EB&keywords=plane+power 
> +alternator&x=0&y=0&search_in_description=1
> 
> 
> On Jan 5, 2009, at 7:27 AM, kgassert wrote:
> 
> > I don't see it on Wag Aero's web site. If you see it for $500 
snap it
> > up. List price is $729 and Aircraft Spruce has it listed for $712.
> >
> > Kevin1
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Caliendo Dan <djcaliendo@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > FYI: About $500 at Wag Aero and STC includes Ercoupe C, D, etc.
> > > Dan C
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 4, 2009, at 9:05 PM, kgassert wrote:
> > >
> > > > I mentioned a couple months ago that I talked to someone at 
OSH
> > that
> > > > was coming out with an STC for a new light weight alternator. 
I
> > could
> > > > not remember who it was at the time but I came across the 
info. I
> > > > looked at their web site and they announced the STC on 12/30. 
It
> > is
> > > > plane power and here is the web site.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.plane-power.com/news.htm
> > > >
> > > > Kevin1
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], Caliendo Dan 
<djcaliendo@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > You need to copy both lines of this web address and paste 
them
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > address.
> > > > > The blue link will give you an error.
> > > > > Dan C
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Dec 19, 2008, at 2:11 PM, kgassert wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I didn't think it covered Ercoupes either but according to
> > the FAA
> > > > > > web site it does.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > 
http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgSTC.nsf/0/a7ae900
> > > > > > 929e0928585256cc10080dc25!OpenDocument&ExpandSection=-2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kevin1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], WILLIAM BIGGS
> > <webacraft@>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am familiar with that stc. I talked with my FSDO a 
year
> > ago
> > > > and
> > > > > > that STC does not include ercoupes. Since it does not 
enclude
> > > > > > ercoupes the STC can be refered to as approved data but 
you
> > don't
> > > > > > have to buy the STC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think Lynn Nelson has done a few alternator 
conversions
> > on a
> > > > 337
> > > > > > only.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bill
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To: ercoupe-tech@: percy.wood@: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 
19:09:34
> > > > > > +0000Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Re: regulators (mechanical 
ones,
> > not
> > > > > > bureaucratic ones)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "WILLIAM BIGGS" webacraft@ posted:"I really think if 
you are
> > > > > > running any significant amp load, or having charging 
issues
> > one
> > > > > > should consider the O-200 alternator conversion. They are
> > > > available
> > > > > > and fairly cheap, there is no STC for the ercoupeso a 337
> > should
> > > > do
> > > > > > using the existing stc as approved data, and if youhaven't
> > updated
> > > > > > your wiring since new it is about time."I beg to differ,
> > Bill. I
> > > > just
> > > > > > got through working an STC for analternator through for 
the
> > > > Ercoupe
> > > > > > I'm selling for a friend. There isan STC - SA1009NE from
> > > > Barnstormers
> > > > > > Aviation (train@). A337 was done, of course. The actual 
work
> > was
> > > > > > done in 1982! The log entry says "see 337 this date," but 
said
> > > > form
> > > > > > Was Not in the airplane's paper work.Percy in NM 
(`coupe's in
> > > > KATS;
> > > > > > $28K), USA
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
__________________________________________________________
> > > > > > > It's the same Hotmail®. If by "same" you mean up to 70%
> > faster.
> > > > > > > http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?
> > > > > > ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad1_122008
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to