Since the engineering is already there maybe a conversion to an Alon canopy 
would do the trick. Also the sills are lower and should make it easier to get 
in and out of.

kevin1

--- In [email protected], kim Blackseth <kimblacks...@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks! Exactly what I was looking for. I'll
> Look into it...
> 
> Kim Blackseth
> 
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Ed Burkhead <e...@...> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Didn’t Jack also have enough arm strength to use an arm-powered chai 
> > r?
> >
> >
> >
> > I suspect any powered chair must weigh more.
> >
> >
> >
> > The usual 9 cubic foot baggage compartment may well be big enough  
> > for a chair.  Perhaps quick release mechanisms would let the  
> > batteries (and/or wheels) be removed and lifted in separately  
> > allowing his assistant to do it through the regular window/door  
> > opening.
> >
> >
> >
> > If any structure needed to be modified, I’d suspect the rear-window  
> > zone would be least structural.  The fact that the Alons have the sl 
> > iding canopy shows that the rear canopy area can be separated from t 
> > he plane while keeping the plane’s structural strength.  Don’t  
> > Alons have some reinforcement of the upper edge of the rear cockpit? 
> >   I imagine using that identical structure might get easiest approval.
> >
> >
> >
> >  A hinge at the back of the window/door structure combined with  
> > pneumatic lifts like are used in car rear hatches could make opening  
> > and closing it more practical.
> >
> >
> >
> > Perhaps even a full bubble canopy could be installed, hinged at the  
> > front windshield support (probably requiring reinforcement) would  
> > let both Kim and the chair be lifted in and out more easily.
> >
> >
> >
> > Heck, perhaps flight testing could show that the canopy is optional,  
> > allowing the plane to leave the canopy at home and fly as an open  
> > top convertible like Leonard Page’s Wasp.  (Didn’t Leonard fly  
> > the Wasp with no canopy part of the time? Did he have any problem wi 
> > th turbulent air over the empennage?)
> >
> >
> >
> > I don’t expect there’s any way to use an external pod on a low- 
> > slung plane like a Coupe.  Especially so for a 14” thick load.
> >
> >
> >
> > These are un-expert thoughts for you to discuss with an expert DER.
> >
> >
> >
> > Good luck, Kim.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to