Well, I'm at work at the moment, and the firewall is preventing me from 
uploading the photos of the part that we're talking about here - I will 
definitely load the photos when I get home tonight 

Thanks again for all the great replies for the newbie

Chris


--- In [email protected], Roy Stubbs <rstu...@...> wrote:
>
> To add to Chris' remarks, remember the Ercoupe is of monocoque
> construction.  The fuselage skin supports some or most of the load.
> Wrinkles I think would be bad.
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of ALAN FAIRCLOUGH
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 10:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Re:New to Ercoupe Tech Group - Question Re:
> Fuselage Skin Buckles Fwd o
> Importance: Low
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Chris:
> 
>  
> 
> You are not clear enough about where the slight buckling is;
> 
> Two possibilities:
> 
>  
> 
> A) It is the wing root fairing that is wrinkled. If this is the case, it
> can be repalced. It is not a structural component and has no effect on
> flying the plane.
> 
>  
> 
> B) It is the side wall of the aircraft that is buckled and as part of
> the structure of the plane is usually buckeld because of a collapsed
> nosewheeel or similar hard landing. An A&P would have to decide if it is
> airworthy or not.
> 
>  
> 
> As an important part of checking a coupe's frame for indications of hard
> landings here are a few things to look for:
> 
>  
> 
> A) The bottom of the firewall can have some serious wrinkling which
> could indicate a nose in.
> 
>  
> 
> B) The two sort of triangular panels under the plane between the walkway
> and the belly of the plane will show wrinkles indicating one of the
> wings being pused backwards or a MLG that hit something. Inspect the
> rear spar on the inside of the spar cap attachment for buckling.
> 
>  
> 
> C) wrinkles on the wing root fairing which may indicate it has been
> damaged and sort of flattened out again to be re-used rather than
> replaced. Not structurally dangerous but a good reason to inspect
> further.
> 
>  
> 
> D) Wrinkles on the top end of the tailcone are usually due to the tail
> being pushed down. only the bolts holding the horizontal stabilizer are
> approved push down points. These wrinkles do not relate to hard
> landings.
> 
>  
> 
> E) Misalignment between the wings and the horizontal stabilizer. While
> the wings have a dihedral and the stabilizer is flat, seen from behind,
> the stabilizer height on both sides of the plane must match
> corresponding points on both wings. Wing angle has some minor
> adjustement at the wing attachment bolts but at most you can move
> wingtips up and down about two inches. A larger difference could
> indicate a twisted main spar. 
> 
>  
> 
> Alan Fairclough
> 
> N87333
> 
> N94694
>


Reply via email to