William who is looking into buying a Coupe asked about corrosion and
accidents:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 

There are corrosion related fatalities in the NTSB database:

 <http://www.ercoupe.info/?n=Main.Hartmutscsection>
http://www.ercoupe.info/?n=Main.Hartmutscsection

  <http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20040315X00324&key=1>
http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?ev_id=20040315X00324&key=1

As evidenced by the NTSB case, even very careful adherence 

to the AD's with the most prudent due diligence is sometimes 

not enough.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 

William,

 

Yep, that one gave us heartburn till we found out more about it.

 

We don't have any conclusive knowledge of cause and effect, just educated
guesses.

 

The pilot was a young CFI giving a ride in the Ercoupe owned by a young
woman (his girlfriend, I think) to whom he'd been giving lessons.  On the
catastrophic flight, he was giving a ride to the airplane owner's sister.

 

The CFI pilot was known to do aerobatics in the Ercoupe - something you MUST
NOT DO.  We don't know if the accident flight involved aerobatics or not but
we don't know why the aircraft would have fallen apart as it did unless it
was doing aerobatics.  The investigators did find some corrosion in the
center section spar and cited it - it's possible that the plane wouldn't
have come apart without that corrosion.

 

The Ercoupe was originally developed under the old CAR regulations which
allowed aerobatics (along with most other aircraft).  Under the new CAR
regulations, as a "normal" category aircraft, it is not allowed aerobatics.

 

The Ercoupes should NOT be used for aerobatics!  They are sleek enough that
they gain speed VERY quickly when the nose is lowered.

 

I wouldn't ride in a Coupe doing aerobatics unless Bob Hoover is the pilot.

 

A pretty fair number of Ercoupe owners got the rivet by rivet sonic
inspection of the center section following the optional service bulletin
that was issued as a result of that crash.  None found any aircraft
threatening corrosion. (That had been culled out of the fleet via the
earlier center section inspection AD.)  A very few of those rivet by rivet
sonic inspections found a few bad rivets which were easily replaced.

 

So, in summary, I would make ABSOLUTELY sure the wing and center section
inspection ADs were properly done.  (No Ercoupes have ever been lost in
flight due to this corrosion but some were grounded, a few beyond economical
repair, due to corrosion found in these inspections back when they came
out.)

 

The fuselage corrosion inspection and confirming that the wing and center
section inspections were properly done are essential to a good pre-purchase
inspection.

 

And, most importantly, I WOULD NEVER do aerobatics in a Coupe.

 

Ed

Reply via email to