This is similar to Canada's "OWNER MAINTAINENCE" Catagory for the older aircraft that no longer are in production. We have had this since several years and it seems to be great. Some of the early Cessna 150's can be in this Catagory. The Canadian system apparently goes quite a lot further, yet appears to have been a success safety wise also. I would think that the American FAA has been closely watching our system. Perhaps your "Experimental Catagory" is closer but I am not too familiar with the US rules. The selling price did not appear to have been a problem here as many feel that many OM aircraft are better aircraft as a result. Keeping good tech logs is important. My J3 Cub replica is a " 51% Rule" and I really enjoy building it. Test flight soon. If I was younger I would build an Ercoupe but the Cub may well be my last project, who knows ? Ron Hynes, Alberta, Western Canada
--- On Fri, 7/17/09, A.J. Demarzo <[email protected]> wrote: From: A.J. Demarzo <[email protected]> Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Have A Look and Thank EAA To: "Ercoupers Tech" <[email protected]> Received: Friday, July 17, 2009, 6:35 PM http://www.eaa. org/vintageaircr aft/0907_ ac.asp __________________________________________________________________ Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/
