Would the microfilmed plans of the 415C show the correct hole placement? These are available at the library archive...
John On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:07 AM, David Winters < [email protected]> wrote: > > > I think we could consider the possibility that the FAA evaluator is > MISTAKEN in his perception. He may be wrong in asserting that the holes > found are improper. > > Perhaps, for example, an ALON style spar got back-fitted as a replacement > into an ERCO airframe. As a result, it would have approved holes that are > not shown in the ERCO plans. > > > > In short, he may be well informed, and he may know what he is talking > about, but in this case he MAY be mistaken. > > Especially since the FAA did not include graphics in their notice, with the > information we have, at this point, the credibility of the FAA assertions > are not well defended nor the specifics of their contentions well defined. > > We can't make good responses without better information, I think. With the > information provided, thus far, I cannot even check out the condition of my > own airplane. > > > > David Winters > > > > > > >
