Long, but I think worthwhile:

 

 

Whenever Google finds a new instance (anywhere on the web) of “Ercoupe” and
“crash” occurring together, it sends me an alert.

Today’s alert was not about anything new, nor about a fatal crash.  It is
however about a Coupe crash that’s instructive.  (I always try to learn from
other people’s mistakes rather than inventing them all on my own.)

In a discussion about pilots fixating on gliding to the airport runway when
they’re having engine problems or failure, this post appeared:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 

I watched a guy in an ailng Ercoupe fly down the length of a long & wide
taxiway at Arlington WA, where the main taxiway through the show during the
annual fly-in there. He was low and slow, and getting even lower and slower.
He stalled and crashed from about 20' AGL when he tried to make the
120-or-so degree turn onto the runway. (don't ever let anyone tell you an
Ercoupe can't stall- they just can't stall straight ahead) He could have
easily landed on that taxiway just by pulling off the little power he had
on. The only thing I can figure is that he was fixated on that runway, and
that since he'd never landed on the taxiway it just never occured to him to
do so. He was alright, just shook up, but it sure didn't do the airplane any
good.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 

 

I’m posting this so we can learn two or three lessons.



1.      With engine problems, don’t fixate on landing on the runway, even if
it looks at first like you can make it.  As I remember my primary
instruction from 30+ years ago, the guidance was to be willing to change
landing spots if needed but try to only change your mind once – don’t change
over and over.
2.      The assertion in the posting is that the pilot thought that Coupes
can’t stall and that the pilot was wrong.  I don’t know what the pilot knew
or not but anyway, the situation is more complex than that.  Discussed
below.

 

Coupes should not be capable of staying in a fully developed stall with the
majority or all of the wing stalled.  When rigged as designed, only about ¼
to 1/3rd of the wing should be stalled with the yoke full back.

As you’ll recall, stall speed increases when you are pulling g-load.  Think
about it – you’re at increased angle of attack because of the g-load and
then you increase the angle of attack to maximum.

Even in a slow onset stall situation, when your airspeed gets down to
whatever is the current stall speed, the inner portion of the Coupe wing
does begin to stall, in a fan out from the wing root leading edge.  Most of
the wing should still be flying and developing lift and the huge ailerons
should still be giving you control.  But you are losing lift.

You can get a big stumble when you suddenly pull back on the yoke in either
straight ahead flight or in a turn.



If you do a hammerhead stall or a sudden, accelerated stall, you might be
able to stall the entire wing for a short time, even if you can’t hold it in
that full stall.  You could lose all your lift for a short time with a huge
drop in the nose as the plane seeks stable, only slightly stalled flight.

 

A Coupe could fall out of a hammerhead into the start of a spin but you
shouldn’t be able to hold it in a spin.  A sudden accelerated stall might
also start you into the beginning of a spin.  Coupes are certificated as
“characteristically incapable of spinning.”  There’s nothing in the
certification that says you can’t suddenly lose a LOT of lift to a sudden
stall.



Needless to say (but I’ll do it anyway), if you do this stuff near the
ground it could ruin a perfectly good Coupe – and maybe you, too.

 

I’d urge you to practice some accelerated stalls in your Coupe, well up at
altitude, and burn into your brain that your Coupe can stumble in the air
and that you can suddenly lose much of your lift. (Work into it slowly –
don’t go for a sudden, deep, accelerated stall on the first try.)

I don’t think any desktop explanation can substitute for personal, direct,
SAFE experimentation.

 

Go fly, gals and guys!

 

Ed Burkhead

http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/index.htm 

 

Reply via email to