All the more reason to have a GA fan ( and Coupe owner) in Congress, which I'm 
trying hard to do.  Check out http://edmishou.com and join me in my effort.  I 
obviously need all the help I can get to ensure more intrusions like this don't 
happen and our SP privileges sustain.
Ed




________________________________
From: Caliendo Dan <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, June 23, 2010 5:48:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] 121.5 ELT's

  
Well written, Tommy. 
Dan C



On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:40 PM, JThomas Terry wrote:

  
>
>
>After a couple of days, there doesn’t seem to be much new information on the 
>supposed banning of 121.5 ELTs in August.  The FCC, as far as I know at this 
>time, has not denied the alleged ban, but they have not admitted it either.  
>Either way, I really do not think it can be done quite as quickly as the first 
>reports indicated.  Given the lack of comment by the FCC, I feel that they are 
>up to something.  With that in mind, I wrote the following letter to the FCC.  
>I’m sure it isn’t perfect but feel free to use it as is or as food for thought 
>to write your own.
>Tommy
>N93929
> 
> 
> 
>Chairman Julius Genachowski
>Federal Communications Commission
>445  12th Street  SW
>Washington, DC   20554
> 
>Sir:
>Recent reports concerning the FCC’s decision to prohibit use of Emergency 
>Locator Transmitters on 121.5 MHz are alarming.  We all know that these ELTs 
>are not tremendously dependable or accurate and I do not think anyone will 
>argue that the potential of the 406 MHz Elts promises to be far superior.  
>However, the reports being circulated, and to my knowledge not denied by your 
>agency, are indicating a very short time for the retirement of the 121.5 
>ELTs.  Sir, this is not practical in many aspects:
>            1.  Production and delivery.
>Can the manufacturers of the 406 ELTs produce 100,000 units in time to meet 
>the rumored retirement date of August?
>            2.  Installation.
>Given the down turn in general aviation maintenance facilities; can 100,000 
>units be installed by the retirement date?
>            3.  Cost.
>Currently an ELT operating on 121.5 MHz can be bought for as little as 
>$200.00.  However, the cheapest 406 MHz ELT I have personally been able to 
>locate will cost approximately $800.00 by the time it is delivered and another 
>$200 for installation.  This is a minimum cost of $1000.00 for each and every 
>general aviation aircraft in the country.  This will mean an outlay of 
>approximately $100000000.00 (One Hundred Million Dollars) from a segment of 
>our economy that is already struggling if not dying.  If so, to what or who’s 
>benefit?
>            4.  Triple frequency units.
>In recent years there have been many triple frequency units sold and 
>installed.  These units operate on 121.5 MHz, 243.0 MHz, and 406 MHz.  Does 
>this new regulation ban those new units because they transmit on 121.5?
>            5.  Search equipment.
>Who will be responsible for re-equipping all search aircraft and ground teams 
>with new radio signal direction finding equipment?
>            6.  Reliability.
>Even with all of its short comings and problems 121.5 or some other ground 
>based and ground searched signal must be maintained.  As good as the satellite 
>systems are; there are times and places where the satellites just cannot be 
>“seen.”
>Even when the 121.5MHz ELT’s were being monitored by satellite, many signals 
>were reported by other aircraft that were later or never heard by the 
>satellites.
>On the subject of cost: Does the FCC plan on issuing vouchers for the 
>replacement units, similar to those issued for television converters boxes? 
>That is only logical since this change will apparently be mandated without any 
>concern for those it affects.  Personally, I would be willing to meet half way 
>as my ELT is not new and I would eventually have to replace it anyhow.
> 
>All things considered, from my perspective and probably that of about 600,000 
>others; this new proposal is extremely short-sighted and it is clear your 
>commission has not thought this new regulation completely through.  Please do 
>not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions concerning my comments.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>Copies:
>Hon. Henry Cuellar, U.S. House of Representatives
>Mr. Craig Fuller, Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association
>Mr. Tom Poberezny, Experimental Aircraft Association
>Mr. Skip Carden, Ercoupe Owners Club
>Commissioner Michael J. Copps
>Commissioner Robert McDowell
>Commissioner Mignon Clyburn
>Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker
> 
>
>

Reply via email to