Good to hear all that Dave, glad you are back in the air.  Do you forsee a 
change in pitch coming up in the future to gain some speed?  I am happy with my 
71 by 51 but supposed I would be very happy with it when I go to the 0200 parts 
upgrade.

--- In [email protected], "bigbrownpi...@..." <bigbrownpi...@...> 
wrote:
>
> Folks,
> 
> Yesterday afternoon was Return to Fly day.  I did my preflight and and after 
> correcting a problem with the control cable spacer behind the seat, Vince 
> signed off the airplane as airworthy and annual complete.  I took off around 
> 3:30 far a short test hop--twice around the pattern with a low approach and a 
> full stop landing. After landing, we checked for leaks and checked the oil.  
> Then Vince and I went up for another flight to document oil temp, pressure, 
> CHT and EGT readings.  It was over 100 degrees by then, and we had some high 
> oil temperature readings that corresponded to low oil pressure at idle after 
> landing, but I spoke to the engine builder and he's convinced that it's due 
> to the high ambient temperature and the need to tweak the baffling a bit 
> more.  Also, we're still running straight mineral oil, so we probably will 
> see some improvement with 50W.  Today I took a solo flight to check flight 
> characteristics.  I did slow flight, power on and off stalls, turning 
> departure stalls, and steep turns.  It was only 85 degrees and the air was 
> fairly smooth, so I could trim it up and see how if flew hands off.  Flight 
> control rigging seems fine-- hands off with the ball centered at 2200 RPM and 
> the wings stay level.  No oil temp or pressure problems were noted today at 
> the lower temperatures.  I had 30 PSI at cold idle and a bit more at higher 
> RPM's and 20 PSI at hot idle.  Temp stayed below 200.  CHT was 350 and EGT 
> never went above 1200.  On climbout, I saw 2400 RPM, and was able to maintain 
> 2525 RPM in level flight and get 108 MPH (McCauley 7148 prop).  My VVI on 
> climbout at 85 MPH was 750, so I'm seeing the performance I expected from the 
> C-85/O-200 STC engine.  Today I found a radio weak TX/RX problem that appears 
> to be a repeat of a problem that the previous owner experienced with the 
> internal antenna connector ground (XCOM 760).  I'm debating whether to send 
> it in for repair or upgrade to an MGL V-10 that can be controlled by the 
> Garmin 396.
> 
> Hope to see some of you at Oshkosh!
> 
> Best,
> Dave
>


Reply via email to