https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221824



--- Comment #29 from Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Filip Andres from comment #28)
> I have built new packages using the following flags in the RPM spec:
> 
> %ifarch %{ix86}
> %global optflags -mtune=generic
> %endif
> 
> Build:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12621253
> 
> Now the erlang:processes() command executes successfully:
> 
> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-i386 --no-clean --shell
> INFO: mock.py version 1.2.14 starting (python version = 3.4.2)...
> Start: init plugins
> INFO: selinux enabled
> Finish: init plugins
> Start: run
> Start: chroot init
> INFO: calling preinit hooks
> INFO: enabled root cache
> INFO: enabled dnf cache
> Start: cleaning dnf metadata
> Finish: cleaning dnf metadata
> INFO: enabled ccache
> Finish: chroot init
> Start: shell
> <mock-chroot>sh-4.3# erl
> Erlang/OTP 18 [erts-7.2.1] [source] [smp:4:4] [async-threads:10] [hipe]
> [kernel-poll:false]
> 
> Eshell V7.2.1  (abort with ^G)
> 1> erlang:processes().
> [<0.0.0>,<0.3.0>,<0.6.0>,<0.7.0>,<0.9.0>,<0.10.0>,<0.11.0>,
>  <0.12.0>,<0.14.0>,<0.15.0>,<0.16.0>,<0.17.0>,<0.18.0>,
>  <0.20.0>,<0.21.0>,<0.22.0>,<0.23.0>,<0.24.0>,<0.25.0>,
>  <0.26.0>,<0.27.0>,<0.28.0>,<0.29.0>,<0.30.0>,<0.34.0>]
> 2> 
> 
> Resume:
> There seem to be an error in the fallback implementation of
> ethr_dw_atomic_cmpxchg. I'm not sure whether these binaries would run on an
> Atom processor though (and I don't have means to test it).
> I guess I may ask in the erlang-bugs mailing list but I would let it to you
> to decide if building for generic processor (instead of Atom) is a viable
> workaround or not.

I've just rebuilt Erlang with -mtune=generic on ix86. However it didn't change
anything on my machine.

Could you please test if it works for you or not? I'm talking about 18.2.2-3
version.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
erlang mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to