https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371984
--- Comment #2 from Randy Barlow <ra...@electronsweatshop.com> --- I decided to write the fedora-devel mailing list to get their input on how to best solve this chicken and egg problem[0]. While writing that post, I realized that there was a problem with the plan to use facls: if the p1_pam package were updated after the ejabberd package set the needed facls on the binary, the facls would be removed and the problem would return. Thus, I don't think that's a viable option. Perhaps having p1_pam create the ejabberd group is the best alternative I've thought of so far, but I'll be interested to see if we get any replies on the devel list. [0] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/HJNJ3Q24T6NFQ2E3UWUPQYVYKQ2S3DBY/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ erlang mailing list erlang@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/erlang@lists.fedoraproject.org
