Hey Timothée! On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 21:41 +0100, Timothée Floure wrote: > First of all, rebar3 is now in rawhide [0]: I know that a few > packages were > waiting on it, and some existing package only build with rebar2 > (which has been > deprecated for a while) due to a mix of hack and chance. I think we > should > rework Peter's packaging guidelines [1] to: > * Replace rebar2 by rebar3 (following upstream) to build all of our > Erlang > packages (do we need to announce a change?) > * Make better use of the Hex package repository [2] > * Push them to the official guidelines [3]
+1 > As for the Erlang SIG itself, I'd like to extend it to the elixir > language [4], > which is built atop the Erlang environment and is already packaged (I > co-maintain it) in Fedora. It would also be nice (mentioned by Randy > if I > remember well) for the erlang SIG to be able to access any erlang > library in > dist-git as it is already done for some other language-specific SIGs. +1. We have an erlang FAS group (I just added you to it), but it doesn't seem I can add that FAS group to permissions in Pagure, so I filed a ticket to request that: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7456 > What do you think? Can I go ahead and start working on mentioned > tasks? +1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ erlang mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
