Hi!
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Jakob Cederlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's looking good! I'm impressed with the full AST that you're building,
> and I think it would really be fruitful for both wrangler and erlide to
> integrate them.
> The way I see it there are two ways to do this, either a minimal approach,
> where wrangler is provided as a plugin within the erlide feature, or a more
> ambitious one, where the AST tools in wrangler is factorized out, and used
> as tools throughout erlide. I'd rather see the latter, of course, there are
> a lot of stuff that can be done when we have a full code model on the erlang
> side: error correction proposals (Ctrl-1), semantic highlightning (different
> colours for assignment and matching), better compare, just to name a
> few. What do you think?
>
I'm still recovering after my vacation, and without having looked at the
wrangler code I see a possible sore point: an AST would need correct code,
while most functionality in an IDE needs to be able to handle incorrect and
incomplete code as well. If the wrangler parser is able to handle that, then
the point is moot, otherwise we'll have to think about it.
best regards,
Vlad
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Erlide-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/erlide-devel
