On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:43 -0600, Eric Merritt wrote: > Mikael, > > I will get your patch applied and see if I can't get a good version > of ssl out there for 3.9. Thanks for the update. >
It would be nice with a working ssl application in the erlware repository. Thanks, Mikael > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Mikael Magnusson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The ssl 3.9 generic package in the 5.6.3 repository is broken. It > > contains ssl_esock a architecture dependent executable in priv/bin, > > which means it needs to be uploaded as a binary package instead of a > > generic package. > > > > http://repo.erlware.org/pub/5.6.3/Generic/lib/ssl/3.9/ > > > > When I tried to publish a new ssl 3.9 package to a local repository it > > actually uploaded as a binary package, but ssl_esock was not executable > > when I installed package. I patched ewl_file to fix that available in > > "[erlware PATCH] copy file timestamps,ownership and mode together with > > the data". > > > > /Mikael > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
