I think you are right, if they accept the patches. They should acknowledge clearly the great work you have done though.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Dave Peticolas <[email protected]> wrote: > Get it here: > > http://code.google.com/p/erlware-mode/ > > This release includes: > > + Patch from bile to fix gen_fsm skeleton. > + Patch from bile to allow configuration of compile dir target > + Fix for gen_event skeleton. > > With the last release of Erlang, the original Emacs mode > is now being actively maintained again, and includes fixes > from the Erlware mode for syntax highlighting and indentation > among others. > > I plan on submitting patches to the original mode to add whatever > features the Erlware mode has but the original does not. Assuming the > patches are accepted, I think it would be best to retire the Erlware > mode at that point, as maintaining a separate fork no longer makes > sense to me. > > dave > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-questions" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-questions?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
