The best would be to move both of those subdirs under the base lib directory. That would bring the sinan app into compliance with the standard. Sinan itself shoudl also look for a lib directory and enforce its presence I think.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Tristan Sloughter <[email protected]> wrote: > Sinan itself does not have a lib directory. Would it be a good idea to turn > server into lib and maybe move client to support? Or priv? Or something. > What is the standard? > Tristan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
