So far, I have yet to find a reason to not like it. Things look good to me,
but I want to mull it over some more. Once we get this finalized, it may not
hurt to send it to the main erlang-questions list for some feedback.

Thanks!
Jordan Wilberding

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]>wrote:

> I am working on a set of extensable types for Erlang using behaviours
> and Paramaterized modules (feel free to ask why paramaterized
> modules) for erlware_commons. In doing this I realized that the API is
> going to be very important, since it will serve as the basis for many
> other types. To that end I decided to put the API out for comment. I
> will do this as a set of specs and docs.
>
> -opaque map(_KeyT, _ValueT) :: term().
>
> %% @doc empties the map.
> -spec clear() -> map().
>
> %% @doc returns a boolean indicating if this map has the specified key
> -spec has(term()) -> boolean().
>
> %% @doc check to see if the specified value exists in the map
> -spec has_value(Term()) -> boolean().
>
> %% @doc return the key value pairs as a set of {key, value} pairs
> -spec as_set() -> set().
>
> %% @doc get the item from the may
> -spec get(term()) -> term().
>
> %% @doc return all keys in the map as a set
> -spec keys(term()) -> set().
>
> %% @doc Add a value to the map
> -spec put(term(), term()) -> map().
>
> %% @doc remove a value from the map
> -spec remove(term()) -> map().
>
> %% @doc get the current number of key value pairs in the map
> -spec size() -> number().
>
> %% @doc get all the values in the map as a sequence
> -spec values() -> sequence().
>
> As you can tell from the specs I am going to define sets and sequences
> very quickly as well.
>
> --
> Eric Merritt
> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
> http://twitter.com/ericbmerritt
> http://erlware.org
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "erlware-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to