> I feel your itch, but we have a bit of learning to do before we open up > yet another front... > I think my understanding of what PropEr can offer is lacking and I would > like to fill that gap before we start adding more to the table. A review > from the PropEr authors of our properties and generators would probably > benefit us a lot. Tha is the sort of feed-back I would like to get before > we deal with the sets!
Yea eactly. Its nice to have the itch, but it needs to be tempored with reality. > No - it should be easy and for starters it will suffice to rely on > proper:module/1 which checks all properties in the given file. > And actually it is probably what you want when you build anyway. Yea exactly, and I would like to get some use of proper under my belt so I know how people use it before I support it in an automated system. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
