On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:28, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected]>wrote:

> One quick question I have is, how much overhead in terms of time for
> testing does using PBT add vs regular xUnit methods?


I have not been an avid unit tester, but my feeling is that you actually
spend less time with PBT.

Raghav, does that correlate with your experiences???


>
> This document is a great start, and I think it covers basically most of the
> things that need to be covered. I however offer a few suggestions:
>
> 1. Remove references to both Martin and Eric. I am sure they will be nice
> enough to let you use your words verbatim(or close to) without putting up a
> fight. Just focus on the concepts, not where the idea came from.
>

I have no problem with that - a quick nod from Martin and Eric will do the
trick for me!


>
> 2. I would cover generators and add at a slightly higher level under the
> title PBT Explained or something like that. I would then save the unit
> test->PBT conversion for the last section and actually show in detail of how
> an actual unit test would be converted to a PBT.
>

I will give that a try so we have a levelled introduction of the concepts
before we dive in.


>
> 3. Just a quibble with the first sentence. I wouldn't consider this a short
> document, and it is only going to grow :)
>

So true - it will be changed!!

kThanks,
Torben


>
>
> Thanks!
> JW
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Jordan Wilberding 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Torben,
>>
>> Could you give me edit rights for the document? I want to go through and
>> clean up some grammar stuff.
>>
>> My username is [email protected]
>>
>> I am working on generating actual technical comments for you
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Jordan Wilberding
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Torben Hoffmann <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have followed the advice from my colleague Raghav and moved our work in
>>> progress document to Google Docs in order to ease the review process.
>>>
>>> Please go to
>>> PropertyBasedTesting101 -
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1kTLvLKDpYBBKgo0S0W4sXUI5-BzAIDYFFfqqklEawao
>>> and submit your comments and suggestions.
>>>
>>> If there is anything you do not understand you should really give us a
>>> hint now since you will not be able to spot the weak parts of the tutorial
>>> once you have learned a bit more!!!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Torben
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "erlware-dev" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/torbenhoffmann

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to