ha! I would never had seen that. Thanks much

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected]> wrote:
> I actually noticed this the first time around, but I thought somehow you
> just copied and pasted wrong because of a newline.
> Anyways,  ?assertMatch([{"a", ["1.1", "1.2" "1.3"]}],
> You forgot a comma between "1.2" and "1.3"
> Cheers!
> JW
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> sort_name_and_vsn_pairs_test() ->
>>    NameAndVsnPairs = [{"a", "1.1"},{"a", "1.3"},{"a", "1.1"},{"a",
>> "1.2"}],
>>    ?assertMatch([{"a", "1.3"},{"a", "1.2"},{"a", "1.1"},{"a", "1.1"}],
>>                 sort_name_and_vsn_pairs(NameAndVsnPairs)).
>>
>> collect_dups_test() ->
>>    SortedPairs = [{"a", "1.3"},{"a", "1.2"},{"a", "1.1"},{"a", "1.1"}],
>>    ?assertMatch([{"a", ["1.1", "1.2" "1.3"]}],
>>                 collect_dups(SortedPairs)).
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > That is just an escape for printing purposes. All tests have it when
>> > dealing with strings. That is because eunit prints the expected value,
>> > a term(), as a string().
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Jordan Wilberding
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Well for one the expect value is "blah", whereas your given value is
>> >> just
>> >> blah (you don't have beginning and end quote).
>> >> Also, I am not sure how the unit tests will treat the \" vs a "
>> >> (without the
>> >> slash).
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> JW
>> >> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Looks like a match to me
>> >>>
>> >>> epl_list: collect_dups_test...*failed*
>> >>> ::error:{assertMatch_failed,[{module,epl_list},
>> >>>                           {line,161},
>> >>>                           {expression,"collect_dups ( SortedPairs )"},
>> >>>                           {expected,"[ { \"a\" , [ \"1.1\" , \"1.2\"
>> >>> \"1.3\" ] } ]"},
>> >>>                           {value,[{"a",["1.1","1.2","1.3"]}]}]}
>> >>>  in function epl_list:'-collect_dups_test/0-fun-0-'/0
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Martin Logan
>> >>> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
>> >>> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
>> >>> http://erlware.org
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> Groups
>> >>> "erlware-dev" group.
>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> >>> [email protected].
>> >>> For more options, visit this group at
>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Martin Logan
>> > Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
>> > http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
>> > http://erlware.org
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Logan
>> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
>> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
>> http://erlware.org
>
>



-- 
Martin Logan
Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
http://erlware.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to