It has broader consequences then this project unfortunately. We might get an excemption for erlware_commons and/or sinan, but one of the points of erlware commons to provide a suit of implementable reusable types, and tests for those types as well. If we get a exemption for the commons, does what does that mean for other libraries that use the tests we provide? Not that we couldn't get a broad exemption I suppose, but I would much rather have the licensing issues be clear and strait forward.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Justin Venus <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not just ask the copyright holder for explicit permission for use in > this project. If they say yes include the response and request with your > source code. > > Justin Venus > > On Apr 5, 2011 4:56 PM, "Eric Merritt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
