Stan, We are actually currently in the process of completely rewriting faxien. Right now it is in alpha and we are testing. With this new version of faxien, the backend is going to be pluggable. One of the solutions we will be providing allows you to use CouchDB as your backend. Would that be sufficient?
We plan to release a beta within a few weeks. We would happy to have you help us test it out. We are focusing Erlware tools to be for Enterprise-type users. Thanks! Jordan Wilberding On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Stan McQueen <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm currently using faxien/portius to provision my development > servers, but I wonder if that is sufficiently robust for production > servers. It appears that portius hasn't received any attention for > several months (at least not in the github repo). I'm considering the > possibility of storing apps/releases in MongoDB (using the GridFS > feature) and fronting that with a web interface that would respond to > faxien install/update/publish, etc., requests. Has anybody done > anything like this and/or does anybody have any pointers to share? > > Stan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
