Thanks for reassuring me - I had a really bad taste in my mouth due to misreading that mail.

On 2/4/12 15:01 , Jordan Wilberding wrote:
We definitely are not switching to rebar. We are just considering integrating the new reltool with sinan.

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Torben Hoffmann <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I assume that the switch over is for sinan to use reltool and not
    for you to start using rebar, right?

    I am - as most of you know - not fund of the way rebar deals with
    configuration management so I was trying to get all the
    dependencies for a project I am building and I got really bitten
    by how much magic rebar throws at the table under your feet. For
    every application that I do manage to install into my ERL_LIBS one
    or two new dependencies pop up.

    I am eating my own medicine with regards to have configuration
    management under control I fork every project since many project
    owners forget to label and in other ways control the version of
    their software.
    This is slightly painful, but compared to the pain of being hit by
    a fantastic new feature in the latest commit of a dependency I am
    taking the pain.

    Cheers,
    Torben


    On 30/3/12 22:31 , Eric Merritt wrote:

        I have been talking with the reltool folks on a side channel
        and they
        say basically the same thing. If they fix a couple of the bugs
        (and I
        hope they will) I might switch sinan over. Though it would
        screw the
        R14 using folks so we will have to see.

        On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Tristan Sloughter
        <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>  wrote:

            Watching the talk on what's coming in OTP this morning.
            Apparently reltool
            is getting lots of work for R15B01 and R16. Some changes
            he says are
            explicitly for rebar.

            Maybe reltool will be more useable.. The talk didn't give
            details of what
            the changes really are, but probably something we should
            look at to see if
            they would be of use for sinan.

            Anyone know what they are?

            Tristan

            --
            You received this message because you are subscribed to
            the Google Groups
            "erlware-dev" group.
            To post to this group, send email to
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>.
            To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
            [email protected]
            <mailto:erlware-dev%[email protected]>.
            For more options, visit this group at
            http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.


-- http://www.linkedin.com/in/torbenhoffmann


-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "erlware-dev" group.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>.
    To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:erlware-dev%[email protected]>.
    For more options, visit this group at
    http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/torbenhoffmann

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to