nintendo wrote:
> I am also for web services, especially REST support.
>
Whoops. Knew I forgot something. I second this. I don't think this would
be too hard - someone correct me if I'm wrong. Erlyweb would only need
to have a couple of new HTTP methods added on top of the GET/POST
already supported which mean doing something like
case yaws_arg:method(A) of
'POST' -> do_something1;
'GET' -> do_something2;
'PUT' -> do_something3;
'DELETE' -> do_something4;
_ -> oops
end
in your app_controller or where ever you needed to differentiate between
the methods. Now, I haven't been playing with erlyweb of late so the
foregoing is most likely wrong-ish at best.
Jeff.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"erlyweb" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
