ErlyDTL doesn't seem to be opposite the ErlTL, at least in terms of enforcing model/view separation. It is indeed more complex, but it has some nice features that ErlTL doesn't have. The real question is what template language most developers prefer -- an enhanced ErlTL with custom tags or ErlyDTL. I'm not planning on replacing ErlTL, but if enough developers want ErlyDTL I think it would be good to support it.
On Jan 17, 2008 7:11 AM, Roberto Saccon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ErlyDTL is in most aspects (simplicity, enforcing Model/View > separation, exposing Erlang to templates) the opposite of ErlTL, > expect for performance, of course, so I wouldn't recommend to replace > ErlTL with it. But offering both, that makes sense to me. > > On Jan 17, 4:49 am, "Yariv Sadan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wow, that looks cool, and I haven't known about it. It would be pretty > > easy to integrate this into ErlyWeb, actually. I'm not sure yet if I > > prefer it to an enhanced ErlTL, but I all for giving developers the > > choice of which one they should use. > > > > > On Jan 16, 2008 4:09 AM, Dmitrii 'Mamut' Dimandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yariv Sadan wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've seen a few ErlTL enhancement proposals > > > There's also ErlyDTL, > > >http://www.rsaccon.com/2008/01/erlydtl-django-template-language-in.html > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
