Yes, that would be fine. Having both mentioned solutions in ErlyWeb
would be all thats needed for archive pages.

I recently started working on some documentation/tutorials for
ErlyWeb. I made a table of contents and I am halfway done with a
"getting your feet wet" tutorial building on the blog application.

The table of contents is just an outline for a tutorials section and
should be discussed on the list, but I think its necessary to have, so
people can pick out parts they want to write documentation for. If I
have finished the first tutorial (maybe tomorrow) I´ll send it to you
along with the table of contents in a private email for review.


On 11 Jan., 02:44, "Yariv Sadan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 6:48 AM, maddiin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > entry:find({{date_part, year, created},'=',2008}).
>
> > > This would call "SELECT * FROM entry WHERE year(created) = 2008".
>
> > > Would that satisfy your requirements?
>
> > Yes, for finding entries by a given date that would be good.
>
> > How about finding dates where entries have been posted in?
>
> > So I could display on my archive index the years (eg. 2008,2007,2006)
> > if there are entries posted in this years. If I am on a year detail
> > page, I want to show the month entries have been posted in.
>
> > Instead of the star selector I want to query for "SELECT YEAR(created)
> > FROM entry" and "SELECT MONTH(created) FROM entry WHERE YEAR(created)
> > = 2008". I also need it for the sidebar and that would meet all the
> > requirements then for making archive pages.
>
> One option you have is to use the ErlyDB driver module directly, e.g.
>
> erlydb_mysql:q({select, {date_field, year, created}}, from, entry}, Options),
>
> but that's not a nice solution because of the dependency on the driver
> and the need to write the full query and include the Options
> parameter.
>
> I think a better solution would be do add a function to erlydb_base
> called "find_fields", which you could use to query for one or more
> fields from a table mapped to a module, e.g.
>
> entry:find_fields([id, {date_field, year, created}])
>
> would return a list where each item is a tuple representing the row's
> value, e.g. {1, 2007}.
>
> You would also add a WHERE and LIMIT clauses as in other functions.
>
> Would that be better?
>
> Yariv
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlyweb" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to