We should decide on how to handle that. One option would be to make an erma-core repo and always have that be the latest official release. In my opinion it's going to be hard having one developer only maintain an official copy.
Matt On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Doug Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 16, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Matthew Kemp wrote: > > Releases 3.1 and 3.2 have now been tagged. >> > > > Is Steven's repo still the "official" repo? > > -- > Doug Barth > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~erma-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~erma-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
