I got to thinking...  Hi, I'm Randall, and I have a thinking problem.

In his autobiography, Deke Slayton responded to people who looked at
Challenger and said Shuttle was too unsafe to fly, and we should go
back to flying Apollos.  Deke didn't like the idea: "If we had flown
25 Apollo missions, we would have lost a flight crew."

This led me to a per flight comparison.  Program for program, Shuttle
is the deadliest vehicle by far, having killed 14 people.  Year for
year, it's a little safer than Apollo, having killed two crews in 22
years, to Apollo's one - nearly two - in 8 years.  But flight for
flight, Shuttle is much safer than Apollo, or even Mercury, Gemini,
and Apollo combined.

Mercury: 6 flights in 2 years; no casualties
Gemini: 10 flights in 2 years; one emergency, no casualties
Apollo: 16 flights in 8 years: lost one crew, nearly lost another
ELV total: 32 flights in 14 years; lost one crew, had two emergencies

Shuttle 1-25: 25 flights in 5 years; lost one crew
Shuttle 26-113: 88 flights in 14 years; lost one crew
Shuttle total: 113 flights in 22 years; lost two crews

So a factoid seen above is that even in its first 25 flights, Shuttle
had a better safety record than Apollo.  Both vehicles killed their
crews, but Shuttle had more flights.

A factoid I haven't seen before is that Shuttle has a better safety
record than Soyuz.  Both vehicles have killed two flight crews, but
Shuttle has flown 113 times to Soyuz's 87 manned flights.  Of course,
that's mostly historical: Soyuz hasn't killed a crew since 1971 - over
30 years - and Soyuz engineers can also point to Progress, Mir, and
the Salyuts to demonstrate their safety record (though they would have
to own up to the Apollo 13 level emergency caused by the Progress vs.
Mir collision, since a godawful user interface was a major
contributing factor there; also the fire aboard Mir).

So we've had more casualties in flight primarily because we've had
more flights.  We always said we would accept that as the price for
opening the frontier.  Let's name some streets after them and push on.

-R

--
Every complex, difficult problem has a simple,
easy solution - which is wrong.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to