five days ago taking that information and attempting to 
create a composite sketch may have made some sense... now 
with all the publicity any recounts will be subject to the 
human minds ability to fill in plausible gaps ... we need to 
rely on the video and other scientific evidence ... humans 
minds and memories are too easy to confuse over issues of 
exact timing of events (seconds/minutes apart) and visual 
clues that do not fit actual experiences. Psychological 
studies would indicate that we can not and should not rely on 
human memory of a visual event (did you see a 7 on a blue 
background followed by a 6 on a red background or was it the
other way around)... in this case you are asking for a 
recount of a visual record for which many participants have 
no experiential background (my guess here on experience) 
which means the observations are suspect (sorry guys).


---- Original message ----
>Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:58:10 -0800
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
>Subject: Re: [ERPS] A question for those who saw Columbia 
locally (in California)  
>To: ERPS Main List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>On 7 Feb 2003, at 21:51, David Masten wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 21:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >     After reading Ian's account, it occurs to me to 
wonder: Would it be 
>> > worthwhile for him and other local observers to get 
together with 
>> > someone (perhaps a police sketch artist) who could turn 
their verbal
>> > descriptions of the event into pictures?
>> > 
>> 
>> I believe there are enough pictures of the shuttle over 
California. Ian has
>> told me that he met up with an astronomical group taking 
both video and
>> photos on Mt. Hamilton. I have seen videos from Ca. and 
Nevada, plus there
>> are reports of several photos and videos from California 
that have not been
>> publicly released.
>> 
>
>    I don't know that. In any case, the question of quality 
must be 
>considered. How many of those observers had to change sites 
and set 
>up again at the last minute, as Ian did? That circumstance 
works against 
>getting good pictures of a transient event like the shuttle 
reentry.
>
>> Police sketches are of dubious usefulness anyway.
>> 
>
>    Perhaps. And I'm aware of witness variability. But the 
human visual 
>system is a very adaptable and versatile recorder of images. 
If enough 
>verbal accounts could be obtained and distilled down into 
pictures, the 
>common features might provide some worthwhile clues. Or they 
might 
>not; but under the circumstances I think it's an option that 
ought to be 
>considered.
>
>Chris
>_______________________________________________
>ERPS-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to