A thought occurred to me today -- the X-15 is usually held up as the best
example of reusable space transport actually fielded. The vehicle lands
like an aircraft, but the lower fin is jettisoned before landing and
recovered by parachute. A vehicles turnaround time is limited by the most
difficult things to recover / refurbish, so parachutes didn't seem to
critically harm the cycle time. Anyone know how many fins were lost? I
know at least one was jettisoned very low.
A couple data points for parachute systems:
A military G-12 cargo chute is baselined for a 2000 lb load at 28 fps sink
rate, and weighs 140lb. Butler parachutes has made a lightweight
replacement for this that only weighed 44 lb, but it wasn't as robustly
reusable. Even counting very heavy drogues, and a completely redundant
system, it looks like our parachute system for the X-Prize vehicle is going
to come in at 5% of vehicle dry mass. The crushable nose cone could be
considered part of the recovery system, but we have to have it there for
streamlining anyway, so it is sort of "free".
I'm still rather fond of rotors of some sort for landing, but they are
going to take a bunch more work to develop.
John Carmack
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
- Re: [ERPS] X-15 reusability, parachutes John Carmack
- Re: [ERPS] X-15 reusability, parachutes Henry Spencer
- Re: [ERPS] X-15 reusability, parachutes Doug Jones
