Anderson, Mark R wrote:
You've just mentioned one of the primary purposes of the patent system.
IMHO, the two goals of such a system are to:
1. Protect innovators
2. Record innovation to prevent loss of valuable ideas
With middle length terms you can have those goals met. As you extend the term of patents, the principles becomes fascist, protecting government mandated IP monopolies. As you reduce the term of patents, the protection is removed for the innovator, for he is only allowed to reap the fruit of his labors a short time before his neighbor is allowed to copy everything he does, without his development debts. :)
There are similar problems when the scope for which patents can be awarded and the scope of infringement are enlarged. If the scope of protection is too small, then adding a hood ornament to the Peterbilt blueprints in the database would negate any and all claims of infringement. If the scope of protection is too large, then Scope can pursue all purveyors of liquids which enter the mouth. As the justice, legislative and bureaucratic branches of government have distorted the patent system in an attempt to fit all categories of protection into one framework, they have undermined many of the original goals.
I think the system is good, but the requirements for innovation have been so reduced, with requirements for actual invention and implentation being replaced with patents for generic concepts, such that the patent database has been flooded with poor quality ideas, and the breadth of protection afforded patents has undermined all certainty about non-infringement.
I think that the Founding Fathers set it up well, it will take men of similar character to put it right again.
-Mark Anderson Chipset Engineer, Intel Corporation All statements are personal and do not represent my employer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Woollard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 5:55 PM
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ERPS] Has anyone on this list ever built a small (working)
turbo pump?
John Carmack wrote:
The patent system is broken, and does not foster innovation...
Yeah, pretty much. Richard Stallman isn't very wrong with his views on patents I think. It's also looking like patents are economically damaging. Still, it's nice when they actually work- protect a little guy
from a big megacorp; but usually it's the other way around.
Still, it's worth doing the odd patent search, mainly to watch your back
I think. There are some good ideas in the database, and most of them have expired...
John Carmack
--
----<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
........ Alex Fraser N3DER ......... ......... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ....... [~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^<
_______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
