The reference site for the PDE information contains a table of fuels and
ISP's.  None were greater than 180 for acetylene and oxygen mixtures.

Art Pennington, Richland, WA

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ERPS-list Digest, Vol 4 #14


Send ERPS-list mailing list submissions to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ERPS-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Anything happnin with PDE's? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   2. Re: Anything happnin with PDE's? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
   3. Re: Anything happnin with PDE's? (Adrian Tymes)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:33:35 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ERPS] Anything happnin with PDE's?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

   I'm new to the list and wonder what's the state of development of PDE's.
[I don't suppose any ERP members are working on them?]
   http://www.galcit.caltech.edu/EDL/projects/pde/pde.html  has the most
information that I have been able to find for detonation motors. [Is there a
better one?]
   I'm enjoying Armadillo's peroxide diary but just wish that civilian
rocket
science were at the point where entrepreneurs were working at the next
level,
explosion power rather than just burner power.
   I fear that the breakthrough inventions regarding PDE's have gone into a
classified patents safe so they cannot be applied by the public. I mean,
they've been studied for fifty years, mostly by the military, Ill bet. Why
no test
flight yet?
   Allen Meece, Key West FL




------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 22:11:50 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ERPS] Anything happnin with PDE's?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Allen,

I'm afraid the PDE's are outside the scope of ERPS' activities and would
probably
be considered 'off topic'.  Arocket may be a better forum.

Dan

In a message dated 12/22/03 4:34:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>   I'm new to the list and wonder what's the state of development of PDE's.
>
>[I don't suppose any ERP members are working on them?]
>   http://www.galcit.caltech.edu/EDL/projects/pde/pde.html  has the most
>
>information that I have been able to find for detonation motors. [Is there
>a
>better one?]
>   I'm enjoying Armadillo's peroxide diary but just wish that civilian
>rocket
>science were at the point where entrepreneurs were working at the next
>level,
>explosion power rather than just burner power.
>   I fear that the breakthrough inventions regarding PDE's have gone into
>a
>classified patents safe so they cannot be applied by the public. I mean,
>
>they've been studied for fifty years, mostly by the military, Ill bet.
>Why no test
>flight yet?
>   Allen Meece, Key West FL
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ERPS-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
>
>
>----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Received: from  rly-yd03.mx.aol.com (rly-yd03.mail.aol.com [172.18.141.67])
>by air-yd03.mail.aol.com (v97.14) with ESMTP id MAILINYD32-1ff3fe77f61228;
>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:34:12 -0500
>Received: from  cube.erps.org (berate.terraluna.org [64.71.149.252]) by
>rly-yd03.mx.aol.com (v97.10) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYD31-1ff3fe77f61228;
>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:33:54 -0500
>Received: from cube.erps.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>   by cube.erps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
>   id 80AAB480094; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:33:50 -0800 (PST)
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from imo-r07.mx.aol.com (imo-r07.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.103])
>   by cube.erps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6551B480002
>   for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:33:47 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r4.8.) id 3.1a3.1e8ba006 (3948)
>   for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:33:35 -0500 (EST)
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:33:35 EST
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 10577
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.2
>Subject: [ERPS] Anything happnin with PDE's?
>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: ERPS discussion list  <erps-list.lists.erps.org>
>List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list>,
>   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Archive: </archives/erps-list>
>List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>List-Subscribe: <http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list>,
>   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-AOL-IP: 64.71.149.252
>X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:XXX:XX
>X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
>
>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:35:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Adrian Tymes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ERPS] Anything happnin with PDE's?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>    I'm new to the list and wonder what's the state
> of development of PDE's.
> [I don't suppose any ERP members are working on
> them?]

I recall a group at UCLA that was working with these.
They ran into a number of problems which would make
PDEs less than optimal for ERPS, including difficulty
of control of a non-continual stream of thrust (though
the group at the link you gave seems to have overcome
this), and a lower ISP than liquid fuels (which I saw
no mention of at that link).  In general, lower ISP
means a less desirable rocket fuel, so if PDEs in
general (rather than just the ones that group
explored) turn out to have a lower ISP, that would
explain why you see so few people working on this.
(I.e., explosion power would be more like the previous
level than the next - again, as measured by the ISP.)

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list


End of ERPS-list Digest, Vol 4 #14
**********************************

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to