Hey Christian,

well, if I want to create the entity from a response by hand, I also need to 
send a response in some way.  I am fine with calling the Marshaller myself with 
the code you provided, but atm I am unable to send a Response, because the 
compiler doesn´t know javax.ws.rs.core.Response. 
If you would override the JAX-RS Response, would I also need to call the 
Marshalling myself or would this work out of the box?

Cheers,

Daniel

Am 05.11.2012 um 19:38 schrieb Christian Sadilek <[email protected]>:

> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I think we can make the JAX-RS Response type work by overriding it. The 
> internal ResponseBuilder needs to be stripped out etc. because I guess 
> building a response on the client isn't very useful. However, I    can't 
> promise it for 2.2.0 but I will try.
> 
> Accessing the entity using a plain GWT response should be possible but you 
> will need to call the marshaller yourself e.g. 
> Marshalling.fromJson(response.getText(), MyEntity.class); or use 
> MarshallingWrapper if you use Jackson instead of Errai's JSON.
> 
> Cheers,
> Christian
> 
> 
> On 2012-11-05, at 12:42 PM, Daniel Sachse <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Christian,
>> 
>> First problem:
>> I could also live with GWT´s Response type, if I could access the entity I 
>> provided with my REST Response. Unfortunately this doesn´t seem to be 
>> possible.
>> I want to stay DRY and I don´t want to implement REST services especially 
>> for the ERRAI frontend. At the moment I am trying to implement another 
>> frontend for my existing application with Errai.
>> 
>> Second problem:
>> Yes I have seen the conversation and I always make my decorators dependent. 
>> Unfortunately the conversation didn´t help me :(
>> Well, which information would you need about my beans? I am just trying to 
>> have a normal interface attached with JAX-RS annotations, a normal 
>> "@Dependent" scoped REST service and a decorator. I don´t inject anything 
>> all. Just decorating a plain REST implementation with some mock data.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> 
>> Am 05.11.2012 um 16:42 schrieb Christian Sadilek <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>> 
>>> Yes, the javax.ws.rs.core.Response object is not GWT-translatable. We could 
>>> try and workaround this by overriding the type (we already did this for 
>>> various other but simpler EE classes). Nobody requested this yet but it 
>>> might be worth doing. GWT's Response type is somewhat similar from a 
>>> client's point of view and can be used in a callback (see 
>>> https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ERRAI/Handling+Responses)
>>> 
>>> The second problem seems to imply that the CDI Decorators have to be 
>>> dependent-scoped. Did you see this conversation:
>>> http://transcripts.jboss.org/channel/irc.freenode.org/%23weld-dev/2011/%23weld-dev.2011-10-17.log
>>> 
>>> Can you share more information about your beans? You can also post it to 
>>> the errai or the weld forums, of course.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Christian
>>> 
>>> On 2012-11-05, at 6:50 AM, Daniel Sachse <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>> 
>>>> I wanted to sum up some problems I ran into while using Errai and JAX-RS.
>>>> 
>>>> I normally use the javax.ws.rs.core.Response Object in my REST services to 
>>>> return different Status codes depending on custom conditions. 
>>>> Unfortunately I get compiler errors telling me : "No source code is 
>>>> available for type javax.ws.rs.core.Response; did you forget to inherit a 
>>>> required module?". Any ideas about that?
>>>> Using Interfaces with JAX-RS annotations like @Path, @GET, etc. with 
>>>> "normal" Object responses work fine so far. BUT, as soon as I try to 
>>>> attach CDI decorators to such an Interface, Weld complains with:  
>>>> "org.jboss.weld.exceptions.UnproxyableResolutionException: WELD-001306 
>>>> Attempting to inject an unproxyable normal scoped bean Decorator….", 
>>>> although the implementation is perfectly proxyable. Did anybody experience 
>>>> something similar?
>>>> 
>>>> Some technical infos:
>>>> I am using JBoss 7.1.1.Final and Errai 2.1.1.Final.
>>>> 
>>>> Hope somebody knows anything :)
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Daniel (w0mbat)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> errai-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> errai-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> errai-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> errai-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev

_______________________________________________
errai-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev

Reply via email to