+1 (though I suspect it's an edge case)
On 01/15/2013 09:52 AM, Jonathan Fuerth wrote: > On 2013-01-14, at 6:49 PM, Christian Sadilek wrote: > >> The advantage of this programmatic solution is that it's flexible and also >> becomes a widget-specific feature which won't add complexity to the >> framework (no additional annotations required). Of course, that argument >> only holds if we consider this requirement an edge case, which I think it >> is. If this is a more common scenario we could also add an @WidgetAttached >> annotation to get rid of the AttachHandler boilerplate or implement the >> suggested @TemplateOverride. > > I agree as well. I'd only add that if we find out later that this *is* a > common requirement, I'd prefer the declarative approach (either > @TemplateOverride or a new attribute in @Templated) over the > simplified-but-still-programmatic approach of @WidgetAttached methods. > > -Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > errai-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev > _______________________________________________ errai-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/errai-dev
