On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Kris Kowal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> The module system proposals, especially the one here -- >> http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:modules > > Oh, a module party! Sorry I'm late and thanks to Peter Michaux for > alerting me that I was missing out. Ihab, if you recall, I met you > and "The Mikes" last December to talk about module systems. I really > like the direction of this thread and thought I'd put in a couple > cents. A lot of the things I want from a module system have already > been mentioned, so some of this is just a reiteration of some of the > great ideas that have been posed; some beg distinctions.
Can you provide concrete examples (something a few lines longer than a hello world module) which shows both the module and importer code? [snip] > The module scope could also contain a "module" variable that refers to > the current module, plus "moduleScope", and "builtins" as deemed fit. > Also, the "moduleUrl", like "__FILE__" would be handy for > introspection. __DIR__ has been even more handy for me so one file can load another one at a relative position in the file system. [snip] > // in <http://my.com/site.html> where the moduleRoot is the same > as the page URL by implication: > import "window"; // moduleScope.window = require("window"); > import "http://jquery.com/jquery-2.6.js"; // moduleScope.jQuery = > require(...); > import "./widget.js" as widget; // moduleScope.widget = > require("http://my.com/widget.js"); > from "./widget.js" import Widget; // moduleScope.widget = > require('http://my.com/widget.js').Widget; (< 72 chars/line usually avoids wrapping.) [snip] Peter _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

