>> I am surprised this is up for debate, I would also think that we would >> want >> instance-private by default. > > We can debate lots of things, some that might actually be in play. AFAIK > this one is not decided in the committee (it's way too early), but IP > does have some strong proponents. > > AS3, JScript.NET, and Waldemar's original ES4/JS2 work all had CP. Java > has CP. So do C++ and C#. It should not come as a surprise, therefore, if > CP has at least to be dealt with by some rationale for IP over against > CP. "Smalltalk rules" won't cut it ;-). > > I'm happy to have a little debate on this topic, given the different > precedents. I'm wondering why you think there's no question. > > /be
I'm sorry, I had misunderstood. I was thinking CP meant one variable per class (like indicated by "static"), but CP means the scope of who could access the private object property. This is a question worthy of debate. Thanks, Kris _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
