liorean wrote: > 2008/8/27 Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I've updated my SpiderMonkey branch based on my understanding of the >> outcome of the past few days of discussion, and would appreciate any >> input that people may have on any other operators. To facilitate this >> discussion, I've produced the following sets of tables: >> >> http://intertwingly.net/stories/2008/08/27/estest.html > > I would be interested in seeing some tests covering the behaviour of > negative infinity and negative zero as well (for comparison with the > binary double equivalents's behaviour).
I can certainly add "some" tests, but if you could be a little more specific of the actual expressions you would like to see evaluated, I will be more likely to produce what you want. :-) Meanwhile, here's a few examples: js> -1/0 === 1/0 false js> -1m/0m === 1m/0m false js> -0 === 0 true js> -0m === 0m true I'll gladly add the lines above to my test suite as well as any others you might suggest. When we get to the named methods, things might get a little more interesting: js> Decimal.compareTotal(-0m,0m) -1 This has implications for the fabled Object.eq^h^hidentical method. - Sam Ruby _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
