On 2008-08-28, at 07:52EDT, Dave Herman wrote: > Lexical scope is in the air. :) Please take a look at the lexical > scope proposal on the wiki and offer any comments or suggestions: > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:lexical_scope > > Essentially, the above is a less radical proposal that simply uses the > lexical scope that's already there in JavaScript, but as you suggest > enforces it with a pragma. The result is a language where free > variables, both in assignments and references, are a statically > detectable error, but with otherwise essentially the same semantics > that > JavaScript already has.
I like this, but wouldn't you want to provide escapes, like "reformed with" and/or a way to declare an individual reference to be free? _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
