> Sounds good to me but it is a little confusing to keep track if "let" > is either in or out of ES-Harmony and if it is partly in then which > of > the several JavaScript 1.7 uses are in and if there will be "let", > "let*", "letrec" semantics.
I've got no crystal ball, but I'd say it'd be unlikely (and terribly silly) that we'd have `lambda' without having `let'. (The `lambda' form would fail in its requirement as an equivalence-preserving primitive if it became a target of `var'-hoisting.) Dave _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
