On Oct 12, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Mark S. Miller wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:07 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * if 'const' has the same hoisting behaviour as 'let', then we >> don't need a separate 'let const'. > > Indeed. "let const" is long dead. Someone needs to clean up the wiki.
There's no strawman:* page talking about "let const", and several recent posts reiterated its demise. But you're right that proposals:block_expressions still talks about "let const". Rather than edit the proposals:* section of the wiki I propose we ignore it for now. Instead of breaking links into the wiki, I will edit http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php to move the link to the ES4 proposals:proposals page down to "Known obsolete", or just remove it (and the "Known obsolete" section). I will remove the feature_specs, discussion, spec, and ri lines too. That will leave The 'strawman' namespace is intended to hold Harmony proposals prior to approval. The 'harmony' namespace is intended to hold proposals on the “ES- Harmony” language. The 'meetings:' namespace is for posting meeting agendas, minutes, schedules, etc. The 'clarification:' namespace is intended to capture high-level issues that need clarification. The 'resources:' namespace is for uploading papers or listing pointers to external sites of interest to the work of this group. The 'es3.1:' namespace is for the “maintenance of es3” work The 'ses:' namespace is for the Secure ECMAScript work Not perfect, just a good start. I doubt anyone will object, but here's a quick proposal before I dispose (tomorrow). /be _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
