Neil Mix wrote:
> The for/closures "bug" is definitely a newbie trap, but its pain is
> not its discovery, but the difficulty of working around it. To me
> this could be a winning argument against re-binding on each loop,
> since re-binding precludes the (admittedly dubious) use-case of
> updating inside the body:
>
> for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> if (skipAhead) {
> i += 9;
> continue;
> }
> ...
> }
The expansions that MarkM and I posted work correctly in that case.
("Correctly" means what a C programmer would expect :-) To be more
specific, updates within the body take effect for the instance of
the variable that is seen by the update expression for the next
iteration.)
--
David-Sarah Hopwood
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
