On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Peter Michaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also is it "should" or "must"? RFC documents are usually very strict > about defining "should" etc and I don't see a definition of "should" > before page 41 of the pdf where this use occurs. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt I think explicitly adopting these definitions would be a good step in improving the clarity of the ECMAScript standard. Other recent standards have referenced this rfc explicitly, For example, http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/ Peter _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
