Yes, you're right here. But why not write
'label: while (true) { ... continue label ...; break; }', to make it
clear that there is an iteration?
Yes, this would be clearer.
Forward jumps are less problematic than backward jumps -- in terms of
Dijkstra's argument, they do not require an index to keep track of the
number of iterations.
I agree. They are unnecessary though, given that one could write:
label: do { ... break label; ... } while (false);
Cheers,
Michael
--
Print XML with Prince!
http://www.princexml.com
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
