Just so there is no confusion on meaning, I'm not referring to let statements nor let definitions but to this portion in particular: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/New_in_JavaScript_1.7#let_expressions
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Breton Slivka Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 5:26 PM To: Michael Subject: Re: Allen's lambda syntax proposal On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This may be a stupid question, but is the current let expression syntax > defined in JavaScript 1.7 too fundamentally different from the sought out > lambda expression to be repurposed? Or would this wreak havoc on current > uses? > I had kind of a similar thought about let statements. Would it be possible to simply turn a let statement into an assignable/callable value? Would that just break too many things? would it get us at least close to the lambda functionality we seek? _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
